Modern Flute at its Classiest: My programmatic and score interpretation ofFrank Martin’s Ballade for Flute and Piano
It
is rather hard to characterize the modern flute’s repertoire with one
descriptive word: Be it “representational”, “programmatic”, or merely
as “colorful”. Usually, when I mention modern flute pieces to people,
they jump back, assuming that I will play something like Luciano Berio’s
Sequenza, or the Boulez Sonatine. These
pieces (and many others) in the modern flute repertoire have made very
little use of the full capacity for the instrument’s expressive
abilities.# There is one piece in particular that is on an expressive
level of its own within the realm of “classical” flute modern
repertoire. In this essay, I will discuss what it is that makes Frank Martin’s Ballade for Flute and Piano
so unique, and will provide my own performance analysis on various
aspects. I will also express why it is that it is such a gem in the
modern flute repertoire.
|
A ballad is a form of verse, often a narrative set to music. Ballads were particularly characteristic of the popular poetry and song of the British Isles from the later medieval period until the 19th century and used extensively across Europe and later the Americas, Australia and North Africa. Many ballads were written and sold as single sheet broadsides. The form was often used by poets and composers
from the 18th century onwards to produce lyrical ballads. In the later
19th century it took on the meaning of a slow form of popular love song
and the term is now often used as synonymous with any love song,
particularly the pop or rock power ballad. -Thanks Wikipedia. |
The
varying musical styles of Frank Martin betray a number of musical
roots, but none can be traced to individual teachers. Born in Geneva,
Switzerland, Martin was primarily self-taught. At sixteen he studied
composition with Swiss composer Joseph Lauber and would later go on to
teach rhythmic theory and improvisation at the Geneva Conservatory. He
was a great lover or religious works, and often believed that the
performance of music as the realization of a score’s essence, and spoke
of the creation of music as incarnation. In his search for a more
profound method of metaphysical expression, he created his own style
from a synthesis of twelve-tone serialism, extended tonality, free
atonality, neo-classicism and various rhythmic experimentations. The
influences of late German Romanticism, French Impressionism, Baroque,
serialism, and jazz can be found especially in Martin’s later works. He
believed that, “One should multiply experiments and technical
researches in order to master all one’s potentialities and thus be able
to respond materially to one’s spiritual concept”.
He
utilizes the serial twelve-tone techniques of Schoenberg, without
embracing the philosophy behind it: He experimented with rhythm and the
colorful styles of Debussy: He synthesized the counterpoint and rich
dissonance treatments of his beloved Bach. (“At twelve he had the chance
to listen to a performance of Saint Mathew’s Passion: The impression on the child was so deep that it marked the composer’s life, to whom Bach remained the
true master”.#) In fact, the motivic saturation of the flute Ballade
would have even put Beethoven to shame. Even so, rather than subscribe
to any of any one of these, he took what he found to be the best
elements of each of them and incorporated them into his own methods of
expression.
Martin
essentially found the “new language” in Schoenberg’s twelve-tone
serialism that his embracing of Debussy and Bach had not quite filled.
In Serialism, he had found the “one that would satisfy at the same time
[his] sense of tonality [his] eagerness for functional dissonance, and
[his] innate and very keen fondness for the chromaticism in the manner
of Bach. The use of twelve-tone series, as strict as possible but yet
keeping [his] freedom, and like-wise a rule [he] observed to avoid or
mask all octaves or unisons, helped [him] greatly in shaking off any
habits which in [his] opinion are not basic to harmonic music, though
they did reign and preside over the whole classic and romantic music”.
He also said, “Far be it from me to criticize these; they produced
nearly all the masterpieces we live by. No. Simply, I felt the need of
a language within which I could discover lands that would be new for
me”.
Although
Martin adopted Schoenberg’s language, he had a philosophically
different view as to the “why” of his method. Schoenberg saw his older
music as continuing the Wagnerian tradition of a world which could only
say of him: "He is a Jew."
For
I have at last learnt the lesson that has been forced upon me during
this year, and I shall not ever forget it. It is that I am not a German,
not a European, indeed not perhaps scarcely even a human being (at
least, the Europeans prefer the worst of their race to me), but I am a
Jew.#
In
short, he took tonality personally. In contrast, Martin leaves
tonality, not out of contempt for the harmonic sublimation of
pre-existing decadent Western European philosophies (that Schoenberg
appeals to); rather, it is in the spirit of finding a new language.
Where Gershwin took a similar step and sought to meld the genres of
Europe and American jazz, Martin was working on taking the what he could
from everything that he encountered.
Frederick
Chopin once said to a student, “He who phrases incorrectly is like a
man who does not understand the language that he speaks”. This may very
well be true, but to be able to say something in a more beautiful,
articulate, and affective way is the point of music. Thus, Martin never
forgot the harmonies of Bach when he discovered and used (though not
with any strict conventions) the dodecaphonic methods of Schoenberg.
However,
in an age where so many questions are answered in the score, it is left
up to the individual flutist to render meaning through her/his
rendition of rhythm, tempo, harmony, melody and dynamics, tone color,
and phrasing. Yet, a problem with “modern pieces” as Katherine
Warkentkin points out in her dissertation#, is that “modern” music is stereotyped
as very analytical and precise. Basically, the composer “gets what he
wants” out of the performer. However, as flute virtuoso Paula Robison
puts it, “[Martin] delighted in, and depended upon, the almost mystical
bond between composer and interpreter, believing that the interpretation
of a score is not something just added on but is rather the realization
in sound for the score’s essence.” Thus, the oxymoron of free form is
translated from Western European tonality to the new world (i.e. “form”)
of Schoenberg.
Frank
Martin’s Ballade itself was composed as a competition piece for 1939
Geneva International Competition and is one among six of Martin’s
ballades. He wrote one for flute piano, trombone, alto saxophone,
viola, and cello. Although his Ballade for flute was originally composed
for flute and piano (and is still most often performed as such) the
edition for flute, piano and string orchestra is the most commonly
recorded.
I think that Robison captured the double-negative juxtaposition emote of this work through the words of François Villon:
Stanza 1
I die of thirst beside the fountain
I’m hot as fire, I’m shaking tooth on tooth
In my own country I’m in a distant land
Beside the blaze I’m shivering in flames
Naked as a worm, dressed like a president,
I laugh in tears and wait without hope
I cheer up in sad despair
I’m joyful and no pleasure is anywhere
I’m powerful and lack all force and strength
Warmly welcomed, always turned away
These
types of juxtapositions and contradictions are all over the ballade:
The harmony and organization contradict what Martin indicates in his
dynamics markings: In m66-76, the flute is told to play forte and leggiero
(meaning light, delicate, and graceful) are over the piano’s insistent
ostenato thumping, which itself has the oxymoronical markings of piano and marcato (marked, pronounced) and secco (dry). These contradictory instructions might (in a German, phrase-obsessed, unified way) seem to be
But
again, it is important to recall: this piece is all about showing the
performer’s abilities and interpretation: this passage can be played
heavy and war-like
One
way of seeing the form of Ballade is to call it a ballade mixed with a
sort of variation on the ABA sonata stricture: Warkenski suggests that
the piece’s structure can be explained as:
A -B -A1 -b -C -b -A2 -B -A3
Sections which begin slowly or moderately.
Fast, rhythmically animated sections
Unaccompanied cadenza
D. Short thematic reference to material from B sections
But
a less musically analytical interpretation of it could be as thus: the
introduction of the Ballade is that of a medieval ballade. It has the
quality of a voice speaking: The continuous eighth note rhythm is
stretched beyond a talking quality when the flute starts to jump
octaves: switching from the human to a more inhuman, unnatural timbre of
voice. The opening can be said to invoke the medieval ballades: a
voice telling a folk story. (In fact, the trombone Ballade itself is an
allusion to folk: The trombone is the voice of Ossian, who is a
legendary Gaelic hero and bard of the third century A.D.) Another tool
that he utilizes in this Ballade is that of the repetitive figures in
the bass line. He frequently establishes a rhythmic ostenato over which
rhapsodic melodies and changes in tempi allude to different characters.
The ballade can be said to share the desperate narrative structure
of Chopin’s Romantic piano ballades.
The
form itself is romantically dramatic, and follows thus as a narrative
ballade. The poetic verse form for a ballade has three stanzas of
eight or ten lines. Each is followed by a brief envoy. (An envoy is a
short closing stanza or refrain which dedicates the poem to a patron or
summarizes the main idea.)
The
first “stanza” of the flute Ballade spans from m.1-43. It is
characterized best by the gypsy-like, undulating line of eighth notes
that become an important forward-moving tool. The opening phrases expand
by increments: the intensity increases and expands systematically,
just as the piece as a whole will. The first phrase spans only four
measures (m 1-4): the second; six (m. 5-10): and third lasts nine
measures (m. 11-19) and with a slight coda with the ascending four-note
theme that can be also seen throughout the work. The first stanza ends
with the start of the first “envoy” (identified most easily as starting
with a chromatic, strong-beat, descending triplet) obtrusively in what
might be thought to be the beginning of the next stanza in m.44-47. The
second stanza starts at m.48 and lasts through the cadenza, only coming
to an end just before the second envoy, which occurs the six-bar Lento section (m.194-6). The third stanza starts at 197, but can arguably end at either 314, 319, 323, or 346.
A
structurally poetic way of reading this dissolve of the envoy’s
function overall structure would be to say that the “envoy” triplet
motif has performed a hostile –albeit passionate- take-over. The
quarter-note triplets in the flute line at 319 “ritard slightly”, but
mathematically, the harmonic rhythm takes over. Because of the new
tempo change at the Meno Moso
(m.324), the piano’s (octave-double) dotted quarter notes will equal
the speed of the regular quarter notes in m. 223. The rhythm has accellerando’ed
on its own. Thus, a seamless change from m. 223 to 224 “sounds” like a
change from 3/4 meter to 6/8, and thus (aurally) recalls the
eighth-note melodic material that permeates the entire piece. Also,
depending on the “tempo”, the piece itself can be read in virtually any
of the 3/4, 3/8/ 2/4, and 6/8. Often, the meter becomes so convoluted
and constant for the listener that it becomes hard to ascertain where
any divisive downbeat is. To the listener, this confusion eliminates any
sense of metric (or mental) stability. The meter and expression are
just as the oxymoronic as were the words of Francois Villon. The
double-negative contradiction evinced through the contradictory
notations, markings, meters, dynamics, articulations, inspire an ironic
feeling of being senseless and lost in a piece whose rhythmic
complexities and design have been engineered to give the feeling of
freedom and improvised virtuosity.
The
ending of this piece is essentially orgiastic in nature: akin to the
swarming of locusts or the rising of some inevitability. Of course,
another interpretation of this very same section can be that of joy; a
triumph of something positive. (Of course, this can more easily be
heard when the piece is recorded in the original version, since more
colors can be done (audibly) when there is less string color and
accompaniment to overpower.) Standard Flute repertoire consists of
what might be called that of the “French School”. Since, at the time of
the genesis of the Boehm-system flute, the flute (right along with the
violin) has become somewhat of a musical acrobat in orchestral
literature. Because of its technical abilities and colorful timbre,
however, it is often used purely as a device for orchestral “color” or
for affects.
The
rhythmic complexities of this piece are astounding. Each time I look
over the score, I discover new minute details such as what I just
analyzed. Also, because of the harmonic character of the piece, it is a
virtuosic piece unparalleled in the flute repertoire: it exposes the
flutist to her/his very greatest artistic aspects, as well as their
weakest. It is one of the most technically demanding pieces in that not
only its level of mechanical articulation and technique required for
execution is very high, but its capacity to show the musical intensity
of the flute is without limit. The Ballade is different from other
pieces in the flute repertory in that it allows the flutist’s individual
style to interpret the piece itself. The flute is no longer a
representation of something like a bird or a mere invocation of color:
it is used as a vehicle of communication of some other meaning. It is
because of this that no two performances of the Martin flute ballade
are the same. The message that the performer sends out depends entirely
on her/his style of playing and choices of interpretation and
performance.
“Martin delighted in, and depended upon, the almost mystical bond
between composer and interpreter, believing that the interpretation of a
score is not something just added on but is rather realization of the
score’s essence”.
Bibliography
Bridget Castillo with Joy Kim. Frank Martin's Ballade for flute
and Piano. Rec. 11 Feb. 2005. CD. UCLA Music Department, 2005.
Celia Chambers with The London Philharmonic. Frank Martin Ballade
for Flute, Piano, and Orchestra. CD Rec. 4 Jan. 1994. Chandos Records,
1995.
Robison, Paula . Paula Robison Masterclassses: Frank Martin
Ballade. Vienna: Universal Edition, 2002.
Rosenschein, Bob. Answers.com. 1999. GuruNet Corporation . 2005
<http://www.answers.com/envoy>.
Schoenberg, Arnold. Letters, ed. Erwin Stein, trans. Eithne Wilkins and Ernst Kaiser, London, 1964, p. 88.
Toff, Nancy. The Flute Book: A Complete Guide For Students And
Perfrormers. New York: Charles Schirbner's Sons, 1985.
Warkentin, Leonora K. "On The Performanance of Frank Martin's Ballade."
Diss. U of California, Los Angeles, 1978.
Wassermann, Jakob “Mein Weg als Deutscher und Jude", Deutscher und Jude: Reden und Schriften 1904-1933,